Identification of feeder root zones for optimal nutrient and water uptake in subtropical fruit crops

Authors

  • Kanchan Kumar Srivastava ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, PO- Kakori, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Dinesh Kumar ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, PO- Kakori, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Kundan Kishore ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, PO- Kakori, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shyam Raj Singh ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, PO- Kakori, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shubham Pandey ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, PO- Kakori, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh, India

Keywords:

Aeration, Organic carbon, Root number, High density planting, Root biomass

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to pinpoints the location specific root system in two depths from soil surface and five horizontal distances from the tree trunk. The horizontal distance was marked in H1 (0-30 cm), H2 (31-60 cm), H3 (61-90 cm), H4 (91-120 cm) and H5 (121-150 cm), at two depths, D1 (0-30 cm) and D2 (31-60 cm). The soil of 30 cubic cm was removed with the help of a sharp spade and sieved with large mesh size to extract fine roots. The soil was soaked in water and sieved and roots were studied.The maximum root number in guava and aonla were recorded at 31-60 cm horizontal distance (HD) and 31-60 cm soil depth from soil surface, while in jamun it was maximum at 31-60 HD and 0-30 cm depth of SS from main trunk. Total root biomass represented the rooting density per unit area, maximum root mass (38.2 ± 5.74 g) in guava was recorded in 0-30 cm deep from soil surface and horizontal distance.  Jamun and aonla under HDP system had maximum root biomass 31-60 cm deep from SS and 0-30 cm horizontal distance (HD) from tree trunk. The roots in length in all crops were maximum at 0-30 horizontal distance and soil depth except guava where maximum root length was noted at 31-60 cm soil depth. Guava, aonla, bael and jamun planted under high density planting system have maximum root number which absorb water and nutrient and supporting their treesat 0-60 cm horizontal distance and depth of 0-60 cm.Fresh root mass recorded at 31-60 cm horizontal distance from the tree trunk up to 60 cm deep from soil surface.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akinnifesi FE, Rowe S, Livesley F, Kwesign B, Vanlauwe and Alegre J. 2004. Tree architecture. Below ground interaction in Tropical Agroeco system: Concepts and Models with Multiple plant concepts.Van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G and Ong C. (Eds.). CABI International, Wallingford, U.K., pp: 61-82.

Darmwal MNK, Mishra KK, Mishra and Devi Pooja 2018. Studies on effect of season, radial distance and depth on root distribution pattern of Kinnow mandarin. International Journalof Chemical Studies.,6(4):1005-1008.

Gardener WR. 1964. Relation of root distribution to water uptake and availability. Agronomy Journal 56:41-45.

Srivastava KK, Kumar Dinesh, Saroj P L, Singh S R and Barman Prananath 2024. Effect of container size on yield and root morphology of different fruit crops.Current Horticulture, 12(3): 24–29, DOI: 10.48165/chr.2024.12.3.02

Misra KK and Babral M. 2005. Studies on root distribution pattern of litchi. Progressive Horticulture, 37:124-27.

Misra KK and Jaiswal HR. 2001. Studies on the root distribution pattern of Karonda. Advances in Horticulture science,8(75):80.

Nagrojah S. 1987. : Effect of soil texture on the rooting pattern of ‘Thompson Seedless 10 vines on own roots and on Ramsey rootstock in irrigated vineyard. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture,38:54-58.

Nye PH and Tinker PB. 1969. The concept of root demand coefficient. Journal of Applied Ecology, 6:293-300.

Rathorem RS, Kaushik RA and Poonia MK. 2013. Studies the rooting pattern of Aonla by rooting pattern of aonla by root excavation technique. Progressive. Agriculture,13(1):15-19.

Singh AK and KK Mishra 2000.Seasonal variation in root distribution pattern of bael (Aegle marmelos). Indian Journal ofAgrilculturalSciences,70(10):717-18.

Southey JM and Archer E. 1988. The effect of rootstock cultivar on grapevine root distribution and density. In: The Grapevine Root and its Environment Viticultural and Oenologicxal Research Institute. Pretoria, South Africa, pp: 57-73.

Stone EL and Kalisz PJ. 1991. on the maximum extent of tree roots,Forest Ecology and Management,46:59-102.

Van Noordwijk, Hairiah MKM, Syekhfani and Flach B. 1991a. Peltophorumpterocarpa- a tree with a root distribution suitable for alley cropping. In: Plant Roots and their Environment. Person, H. and Mc Michael, B L (eds.) Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp: 526-532.

Williams LE and Smith RJ. 1991. The effect of rootstock on the portioning of dry weight, nitrogen and potassium and root distribution of Cabernet sauvignon grapevine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture,42:118- 122.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Srivastava, K. K. ., Kumar, D. ., Kishore, K. ., Singh, S. R. ., & Pandey, S. . (2025). Identification of feeder root zones for optimal nutrient and water uptake in subtropical fruit crops. Current Horticulture, 13(4), 70–73. Retrieved from https://currenthorticulture.com/index.php/CURHOR/article/view/322